Co-authored-by: umesh429 <3474974+umesh429@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| src | ||
| Cargo.toml | ||
| README.md | ||
README.md
pdfcraft-audit
Layer L4 (may use edit): verification tooling, the faux-redaction audit.
let findings: Vec<Finding> = audit_redactions(&doc)?; // page, kind, rect, covered_text
It reports two kinds of finding:
- faux redaction: an opaque filled rectangle painted after text it overlaps, dark enough against the text's colour (WCAG contrast below 3) to hide it, while the text is still extractable underneath;
- unapplied mark: a Redact annotation that was marked but never applied.
A properly applied redaction removes the text, so it never flags. Page backgrounds, table shading and highlights don't either: they're painted before the text, or light against it.
Limits, by design and documented rather than hidden:
- only
rerectangles closed by a fill count as covers (not arbitrary paths, shadings or patterns), and a translucent one (/cabelow 1) is not flagged; - covers inside form XObjects are found, but only text drawn directly in the page content is checked under them;
- annotation rectangles are compared in unrotated user space, so
/Rotatepages may misalign.
It fails closed: an undecodable content stream, malformed /Annots, form XObjects nested deeper
than 32 or in a cycle, or a walk past the operator bound is an error, never "no findings".
Surfaces: the redact_audit automation tool and pdfcraft-cli.