From 4dd44ddf16c810c4bcaa16e0bdb3b09bfcb4e33a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: morluto <76467478+morluto@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2026 04:24:39 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] test(ida): expect direction in combined call coverage

Keep the ARM64 dossier boundary assertion aligned with caller/callee coverage ownership while preserving unknown coverage, diagnostics, and observed callee assertions.

Validation: recorded IDA protocol and callee relationship boundary tests (22 passed). Live IDA was not exercised.
---
 tests/boundary/providers/ida/calleeRelationships.test.ts | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tests/boundary/providers/ida/calleeRelationships.test.ts b/tests/boundary/providers/ida/calleeRelationships.test.ts
index 7de3637d8..1204b4d10 100644
--- a/tests/boundary/providers/ida/calleeRelationships.test.ts
+++ b/tests/boundary/providers/ida/calleeRelationships.test.ts
@@ -37,7 +37,8 @@ it("keeps unknown caller coverage and callee diagnostics in an ARM64 dossier", a
     if (!result.ok) throw result.error;
     expect(result.value.relationshipCoverage).toMatchObject({
       status: "unknown",
-      reason: "Upstream xrefs do not establish direct caller relationships.",
+      reason:
+        "Callers: Upstream xrefs do not establish direct caller relationships.",
       diagnostics: expect.arrayContaining([
         expect.stringContaining("targets IDA does not recognize as functions"),
       ]),