fix: repair the static-check failures on the default branch (#2895)
* fix: repair the static-check failures on the default branch
The default branch fails its own required `Static checks` job three ways, so
every pull request reports that job as failed regardless of its own change.
- `npm run format:check` reports `src/domain/functionComparison.test.ts` and
`src/ida/IdaOperationRunner.ts`.
- `npm run lint` reports a duplicate `import { join } from "node:path"` in
`tests/boundary/mcp/ghidraInventoryMcp.test.ts` (lines 4 and 17).
- `npm run typecheck` reports `format: "devin"` missing from the client format
union in `src/application/SupportedClients.ts`, and an unchecked index in
`tests/boundary/cli/clientProfileLifecycle.test.ts`, whose pair array is
inferred as `string[][]`.
Apply the pinned formatter, drop the duplicate import, list the `"devin"` format
that its own definition already uses, and mark the pair array `as const`.
Validation: `npm run check:fast` and `npm run format:check` pass.
* fix(setup): keep Devin on the JSON configuration dialect
---------
Co-authored-by: 吴佳浩 <wujiahao@supremind.com>
Co-authored-by: morluto <76467478+morluto@users.noreply.github.com>
(cherry picked from commit df3d96da80)
This commit is contained in:
parent
0d2bb5fb09
commit
ccc009412e
|
|
@ -175,7 +175,9 @@ describe("function comparison normalized identity", () => {
|
|||
it("retains unresolved call details alongside missing facet coverage", () => {
|
||||
const value: Record<string, unknown> = {
|
||||
...dossier("return 0;", "0x1000"),
|
||||
unresolved_calls: [{ address: "0x1010", reason: "Unknown indirect target" }],
|
||||
unresolved_calls: [
|
||||
{ address: "0x1010", reason: "Unknown indirect target" },
|
||||
],
|
||||
};
|
||||
delete value.facet_availability;
|
||||
const legacy = observe("a", functionDossierSchema.parse(value), "ida");
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -503,7 +503,8 @@ export class IdaOperationRunner {
|
|||
items: [],
|
||||
availability: {
|
||||
available: false,
|
||||
reason: "Upstream xrefs do not establish direct caller relationships.",
|
||||
reason:
|
||||
"Upstream xrefs do not establish direct caller relationships.",
|
||||
},
|
||||
coverage: {
|
||||
status: "unknown",
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue