274 lines
8.2 KiB
TypeScript
274 lines
8.2 KiB
TypeScript
import { describe, expect, it } from "vitest";
|
|
import { parseProcessCapture } from "./processCapture.js";
|
|
import {
|
|
compareProcessTraces,
|
|
processTraceComparisonResultSchema,
|
|
type ProcessTraceSpecification,
|
|
} from "./processTraceComparison.js";
|
|
import {
|
|
capture,
|
|
partialSpecification,
|
|
terminal,
|
|
values,
|
|
websocket,
|
|
} from "./processTraceComparison.fixture.js";
|
|
|
|
describe("process trace comparison: declared schedules", () => {
|
|
it("accepts only explicitly declared concurrent schedules without timestamp causality", () => {
|
|
const left = capture(values(["terminal", "process", "http", "websocket"]));
|
|
const right = capture(values(["terminal", "http", "process", "websocket"]));
|
|
const comparison = compareProcessTraces(
|
|
left,
|
|
right,
|
|
partialSpecification(),
|
|
);
|
|
expect(comparison.verdict).toBe("equivalent");
|
|
expect(comparison.left.raw_trace.map(({ event_id }) => event_id)).toEqual([
|
|
"ready",
|
|
"worker",
|
|
"status",
|
|
"done",
|
|
]);
|
|
expect(comparison.right.raw_trace.map(({ event_id }) => event_id)).toEqual([
|
|
"ready",
|
|
"status",
|
|
"worker",
|
|
"done",
|
|
]);
|
|
expect(comparison.left.satisfied_constraints).toContain(
|
|
"unordered:worker:status",
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
it("returns the minimal journal slice for a reversed required edge", () => {
|
|
const baseline = capture(
|
|
values(["terminal", "process", "http", "websocket"]),
|
|
);
|
|
const reversed = capture(
|
|
values(["process", "terminal", "http", "websocket"]),
|
|
);
|
|
const comparison = compareProcessTraces(
|
|
baseline,
|
|
reversed,
|
|
partialSpecification(),
|
|
);
|
|
expect(comparison).toMatchObject({
|
|
verdict: "different",
|
|
diagnostic: {
|
|
kind: "edge",
|
|
side: "right",
|
|
event_ids: ["ready", "worker"],
|
|
locations: [{ capture_order: 2 }, { capture_order: 1 }],
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
expect(
|
|
processTraceComparisonResultSchema.safeParse({
|
|
...comparison,
|
|
right: { ...comparison.right, matched_variant: "invented" },
|
|
}).success,
|
|
).toBe(false);
|
|
});
|
|
it("enforces explicit negative not-before constraints", () => {
|
|
const specification: ProcessTraceSpecification = {
|
|
events: [
|
|
{
|
|
id: "ready",
|
|
source: "terminal_raw",
|
|
exact: terminal,
|
|
cardinality: { kind: "required" },
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
id: "done",
|
|
source: "websocket",
|
|
exact: websocket,
|
|
cardinality: { kind: "required" },
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
language: {
|
|
kind: "partial_order",
|
|
happens_before: [],
|
|
not_before: [{ event: "done", anchor: "ready" }],
|
|
unordered_groups: [],
|
|
prefix: [],
|
|
suffix: [],
|
|
},
|
|
};
|
|
const normal = capture(
|
|
values(["terminal", "process", "http", "websocket"]),
|
|
);
|
|
const invalid = capture(
|
|
values(["websocket", "terminal", "process", "http"]),
|
|
);
|
|
expect(compareProcessTraces(normal, invalid, specification)).toMatchObject({
|
|
verdict: "different",
|
|
diagnostic: {
|
|
kind: "edge",
|
|
side: "right",
|
|
event_ids: ["done", "ready"],
|
|
},
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
it("supports declared optional events and bounded duplicates", () => {
|
|
const first = { sequence: 0, at_ms: 1, data: "tick" };
|
|
const second = { sequence: 1, at_ms: 2, data: "tick" };
|
|
const one = capture({
|
|
frames: [first],
|
|
process_samples: [],
|
|
filesystem_checkpoints: [],
|
|
protocol_events: [],
|
|
shim_events: [],
|
|
event_journal: [{ capture_order: 0, collection: "frames", index: 0 }],
|
|
});
|
|
const two = capture({
|
|
frames: [first, second],
|
|
process_samples: [],
|
|
filesystem_checkpoints: [],
|
|
protocol_events: [],
|
|
shim_events: [],
|
|
event_journal: [
|
|
{ capture_order: 0, collection: "frames", index: 0 },
|
|
{ capture_order: 1, collection: "frames", index: 1 },
|
|
],
|
|
});
|
|
const specification: ProcessTraceSpecification = {
|
|
events: [
|
|
{
|
|
id: "tick1",
|
|
source: "terminal_raw",
|
|
exact: first,
|
|
cardinality: { kind: "required" },
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
id: "tick2",
|
|
source: "terminal_raw",
|
|
exact: second,
|
|
cardinality: { kind: "optional" },
|
|
},
|
|
],
|
|
language: {
|
|
kind: "finite_traces",
|
|
variants: [
|
|
{ id: "one", trace: ["tick1"] },
|
|
{ id: "two", trace: ["tick1", "tick2"] },
|
|
],
|
|
},
|
|
};
|
|
expect(compareProcessTraces(one, two, specification)).toMatchObject({
|
|
verdict: "equivalent",
|
|
left: { matched_variant: "one" },
|
|
right: { matched_variant: "two" },
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe("process trace comparison: evidence sufficiency", () => {
|
|
it("enforces exact and range cardinality for one repeated predicate", () => {
|
|
const repeated = (count: number) =>
|
|
capture({
|
|
frames: Array.from({ length: count }, (_, sequence) => ({
|
|
sequence,
|
|
at_ms: sequence,
|
|
data: "tick",
|
|
})),
|
|
process_samples: [],
|
|
filesystem_checkpoints: [],
|
|
protocol_events: [],
|
|
shim_events: [],
|
|
event_journal: Array.from({ length: count }, (_, index) => ({
|
|
capture_order: index,
|
|
collection: "frames" as const,
|
|
index,
|
|
})),
|
|
});
|
|
const event: Omit<
|
|
ProcessTraceSpecification["events"][number],
|
|
"cardinality"
|
|
> = {
|
|
id: "tick",
|
|
source: "terminal_raw",
|
|
exact: { data: "tick" },
|
|
ignore_fields: ["sequence", "at_ms"],
|
|
};
|
|
const rangeSpecification: ProcessTraceSpecification = {
|
|
events: [{ ...event, cardinality: { kind: "range", min: 2, max: 3 } }],
|
|
language: {
|
|
kind: "partial_order",
|
|
happens_before: [],
|
|
not_before: [],
|
|
unordered_groups: [],
|
|
prefix: [],
|
|
suffix: [],
|
|
},
|
|
};
|
|
expect(
|
|
compareProcessTraces(repeated(2), repeated(3), rangeSpecification),
|
|
).toMatchObject({ verdict: "equivalent" });
|
|
expect(
|
|
compareProcessTraces(repeated(1), repeated(2), rangeSpecification),
|
|
).toMatchObject({
|
|
verdict: "different",
|
|
diagnostic: { kind: "cardinality", side: "left" },
|
|
});
|
|
expect(
|
|
compareProcessTraces(repeated(2), repeated(4), rangeSpecification),
|
|
).toMatchObject({
|
|
verdict: "different",
|
|
diagnostic: { kind: "cardinality", side: "right" },
|
|
});
|
|
const exactSpecification: ProcessTraceSpecification = {
|
|
events: [{ ...event, cardinality: { kind: "exact", count: 2 } }],
|
|
language: {
|
|
kind: "finite_traces",
|
|
variants: [{ id: "two", trace: ["tick", "tick"] }],
|
|
},
|
|
};
|
|
expect(
|
|
compareProcessTraces(repeated(2), repeated(2), exactSpecification),
|
|
).toMatchObject({ verdict: "equivalent" });
|
|
expect(
|
|
compareProcessTraces(repeated(3), repeated(2), exactSpecification),
|
|
).toMatchObject({
|
|
verdict: "different",
|
|
diagnostic: { kind: "cardinality", side: "left" },
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
it("never proves equivalence from truncated, unknown, or journal-free evidence", () => {
|
|
const complete = capture(
|
|
values(["terminal", "process", "http", "websocket"]),
|
|
);
|
|
const truncated = capture(
|
|
values(["terminal", "process", "http", "websocket"]),
|
|
{ truncated: true },
|
|
);
|
|
expect(
|
|
compareProcessTraces(complete, truncated, partialSpecification()).verdict,
|
|
).toBe("unknown");
|
|
const unknown = capture(
|
|
values(["terminal", "process", "http", "websocket"]),
|
|
{ residualUnknowns: [{ scope: "protocol", reason: "gap" }] },
|
|
);
|
|
expect(
|
|
compareProcessTraces(complete, unknown, partialSpecification()).verdict,
|
|
).toBe("unknown");
|
|
const noJournal = parseProcessCapture({
|
|
...complete,
|
|
event_journal: [],
|
|
});
|
|
const comparison = compareProcessTraces(
|
|
complete,
|
|
noJournal,
|
|
partialSpecification(),
|
|
);
|
|
expect(comparison).toMatchObject({
|
|
verdict: "unknown",
|
|
diagnostic: { kind: "journal", side: "right" },
|
|
});
|
|
const incompleteJournal = {
|
|
...complete,
|
|
event_journal: (complete.event_journal ?? []).slice(1),
|
|
};
|
|
expect(() => parseProcessCapture(incompleteJournal)).toThrow(
|
|
"Invalid process capture: event_journal.0.capture_order",
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|